--- title: "Custom AI for enterprise leadership - pages by role" description: "Pages tailored for the role you sit in. CIO, CISO, CRO, General Counsel, DPO. Same TRACE methodology, different concerns." url: https://impetora.com/for author: Impetora --- # Custom AI for enterprise leadership > Pages tailored for the role you sit in. Same TRACE methodology, different concerns. ## Personas ### Custom AI for the CIO Role: Chief Information Officer. TRACE spine: Architecture. A CIO portfolio is a collection of AI pilots, vendor platforms, and shadow tools acquired across business units. Most never reach production, and the ones that do rarely integrate with the data warehouse, identity provider, and observability stack that already runs the enterprise. Impetora designs the architecture that makes the portfolio coherent, vendor-agnostic, and recoverable. BCG and MIT Sloan report that 70 to 85 percent of enterprise AI pilots never reach production, and Gartner forecasts 33 percent of GenAI projects abandoned by end of 2025. Read: https://impetora.com/for/cio Markdown: https://impetora.com/md/for/cio ### Custom AI for the CISO Role: Chief Information Security Officer. TRACE spine: Trust. AI security posture is the union of adversarial robustness, data-leakage prevention, supply-chain visibility, and an evidence chain your SOC team can pull during an incident. Off-the-shelf AI ships the model. Impetora ships the controls around the model. Every system is mapped to the OWASP Top 10 for LLM applications and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework before it goes near production traffic. Read: https://impetora.com/for/ciso Markdown: https://impetora.com/md/for/ciso ### Custom AI for the CRO Role: Chief Risk Officer. TRACE spine: Readiness. Model risk management is the discipline of identifying, measuring, monitoring, and controlling the risk of model failure across the lifecycle, from data ingestion through validation, deployment, change-control, and retirement. AI does not replace this framework. AI sits inside it. Impetora designs every system to fit your existing three-lines-of-defence governance, with documentation that maps to SR 11-7 (5 lifecycle stages), the EU AI Act risk tiers (4 tiers, 8 Annex III categories), and DORA outsourcing obligations (5 ICT pillars). Read: https://impetora.com/for/cro Markdown: https://impetora.com/md/for/cro ### Custom AI for the General Counsel Role: General Counsel. TRACE spine: Citations and Evidence. A General Counsel reading an AI vendor contract is looking for four things: a defensible posture under the EU AI Act and GDPR, IP-clean training data, indemnity language that survives a copyright or data-subject claim, and a regulator-pack that exists before launch and not after the first complaint. Impetora builds to that brief by default. EU AI Act Article 99 sets fine ceilings up to EUR 35 million for prohibited-practice breach. GDPR Article 83(5) sets fines up to 4 percent of global annual turnover. Annex IV requires nine technical-documentation chapters for high-risk systems. Read: https://impetora.com/for/clo Markdown: https://impetora.com/md/for/clo ### Custom AI for the DPO Role: Data Protection Officer. TRACE spine: Trust. A Data Protection Officer reviewing an AI system asks four questions: does it trigger Article 35 DPIA, what is the lawful basis under GDPR, where does it sit under the EU AI Act, and can the system support a data-subject rights request without forensic archaeology. Impetora designs every build to answer those four questions in writing before launch. GDPR Article 35 makes DPIA mandatory for systematic large-scale or sensitive processing. Article 22 protects data subjects from solely-automated decisions with legal effects. AI Act Article 10 sets data and data-governance obligations for high-risk systems. Read: https://impetora.com/for/dpo Markdown: https://impetora.com/md/for/dpo